The most interesting thing about Harvard Business School selling a $699 bootcamp with AI avatars of its own instructors is not that it feels dystopian. It’s that the avatars are the least important part of the story.
Most of the reaction I’ve seen frames this as prestige on discount, a famous school renting out digital copies of its faculty to people who couldn’t get into the real thing. Fair enough as a gut response. But if you look at what participants in the HBS Foundry program actually do with these replicas, the pitch is not “learn from a Harvard professor.” It’s “practice your pitch and your board meeting as many times as you want, and get feedback every time.” That’s a different product entirely, and it’s one that human instructors have never been able to offer at scale.
What’s actually happening here
The setup, based on what’s been reported: Harvard Business School built AI-generated replicas of instructors into its Foundry accelerator. Participants run practice sessions with those virtual instructors, including startup pitches and board meetings, and the avatars give feedback. The whole thing costs $699.
That’s the extent of the confirmed detail, and I want to be upfront about it. I don’t know which models are under the hood, how the feedback is generated, how much the real instructors reviewed or shaped it, or how good the responses actually are. Those are the questions I’d want answered before recommending it to anyone. What I can talk about is the shape of the idea, because it’s a shape we’re going to see a lot more of.
The thing AI is genuinely good at
If you’re new to AI agents, this is a useful example to hold onto, because it sidesteps the usual confusion about what these systems are for.
An AI agent is not a person. It doesn’t know your business, it doesn’t have a reputation on the line, and it can’t introduce you to an investor. What it can do is respond, consistently, forever, without getting bored or checking the clock. And it turns out an enormous amount of professional skill-building is just repetition with feedback that nobody has the patience to sit through with you.
Think about how pitch practice normally works. You get one shot in front of someone whose time is expensive. You’re nervous, you’re performing, and you spend more energy managing the interaction than absorbing the critique. Then it’s over. Compare that to running the same pitch eleven times in an afternoon, deliberately botching the financials on round four to see what gets flagged, trying a completely different opening on round nine. Nobody is judging you. Nobody is tired of you.
That second version is not better than real mentorship. It’s a different tool, and it fills a gap that real mentorship structurally cannot. The most useful AI agents I’ve seen in the last two years all share this quality: they’re valuable not because they’re smarter than a person, but because they’re available in quantities a person never could be.
Where I’d be careful
A few honest reservations, because I don’t think enthusiasm is the same as endorsement.
- Feedback quality is invisible from the outside. An avatar that looks and sounds like a respected instructor carries borrowed authority. If the underlying responses are generic startup advice, that authority makes it harder, not easier, to notice.
- Practice with a predictable partner has a ceiling. Real board members interrupt, get distracted, and ask the question you were hoping to avoid. If the avatar is agreeable, you’re rehearsing for a room that doesn’t exist.
- Likeness and consent matter. Faculty presumably agreed to this. But “instructor whose face teaches courses indefinitely” is a new category of labor arrangement, and it’s worth watching how institutions handle it.
- Price signals expectation. $699 is modest for executive education and steep for an online course. Whichever frame you bring, you’ll be measuring it against something it may not be.
Why this pattern will spread
Set Harvard aside for a second. The underlying template is simple: take a scarce human interaction, identify the part that’s repetitive rehearsal rather than genuine judgment, and let an agent handle that part on demand. Mock interviews. Difficult conversations with a direct report. Sales objection handling. Bedside manner. Language practice with someone who won’t wince.
None of that replaces the humans. It replaces the impossibility of getting fifty reps in.
So my read is that this isn’t a famous school cheapening itself. It’s an early, slightly awkward version of something that will feel completely normal in five years, and the awkwardness is mostly cosmetic. The uncanny part is the face on the screen. The useful part is that it will run your pitch again, right now, and again after that.
🕒 Published: